2. I enjoyed the work of Wim Crouwel. I think many of his works could be seen as minimal, but as a designer knowing when to be minimal and basic should been seen as a strength. Many of his works were eye-catching and tasteful, and I enjoyed many of the architectural designs he did as well as some advertisements. He uses type faces and colors to his advantage, and creates an overall pleasing design that incorporates some of the main aspects of the building, company, etc. into his work. To describe Wim Crouwel's work I would say it is uncomplicated, indispensable, and innovative.
I definitely wouldn't relate what how I viewed Wim Crouwel's work to Jackson Pollock's. Crouwel's work is much more simplistic, basic, and organized. The lines are parallel and complementary much more than Pollock's random abstractness. I found his work to be much more similar to that of Mark Rothko. Not only are the colors more similar to that of Crouwel's, but the basic design and flow of lines/creation of space throughout the works are much more similar. The basic, engaging draw of Crouwel's work is mirrored in Rothko's. The symmetry and simplicity of Donald Judd's designs I can also relate to Crouwel's. Though no font or wording is used in either of these last two artist's works, the basic themes and principles of art are the same. Crouwel just uses a new dimension in his artwork, and this dimesion is known as text.
When I looked into artists I thought to be similar to Crouwel, I realized matching styles of topography is a very difficult thing to do. I finally reached a conclusion, however, when I spotted the work of Neville Brody. He has a similarly simple style, yet appealing because of the type face and color usage. He is a little more bold with his works than Crouwel but I enjoyed them all the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment